Comparison of PiLAT procedure and Crystallized Phenol Application in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

" /> Comparison of PiLAT procedure and Crystallized Phenol Application in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

"/>
Join us   Log in   jmsr2014@yahoo.com  


JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL RESEARCH - Vol. VIII, n 2, December 2021

Pages: 1030-1036
Print Article   Download XML  Download PDF

Comparison of PiLAT procedure and Crystallized Phenol Application in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery

Author: Erkan Dalbasi, Ömer Lütfi Akgül, Abidin Tüzün, Ercan Gedik

Category: JMSR Surgery

Abstract:

Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is an infectious, chronic and benign disorder of the sacrococcygeal area, predominantly encountered in young men. The surgical treatment of PSD has a wide range from minimally invasive interventions to complex flap techniques, however there is no agreement on the surgical approach. Minimally invasive procedures such as crystallized phenol (CP) application, sinusectomy, and pilonidal sinus tract ablation with laser (PiLAT) are easily applied, need a short hospital stay, cause less postoperative pain and minimal tissue loss, and have good cosmetic results. In this study, we aimed to compare the data of PSD patients treated with minimally invasive methods, namely CP and PiLAT. Material and Methods: The files of 245 PSD patients who were treated with the CP or PiLAT in our clinic between January 2016 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 120 patients in the CP group and 125 patients in the PiLAT group. Both group were analyzed for age, gender, the number of sinuses, duration of surgery, severity of postoperative pain and need for analgesics, duration of antibiotic use, postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, seroma, cosmetic), time to return to daily activities, satisfaction for procedure, body mass index (BMI) and recurrence rates. Results: The patients in the PiLAT group were discharged the next day after the procedure, while the patients in the CP group discharged on the same day (p<0.001). The mean number of sinuses was 2.2 ± 0.25 in the CP group and 3.6 ± 0.81 in the PiLAT group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). The mean dressing time was 3.1 ± 0.4 days in the PiLAT group, while it was longer, 9.5 ± 2.1 days, in the CP group (p <0.001). Conclusion: CP and PiLAT procedures are minimally invasive methods that can be safely used in the treatment of PSD.

Keywords: Crystallized phenol, Minimally invasive, PiLAT, Pilonidal sinüs disease, Surgery

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46327/msrjg.1.000000000000208

DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.46327/msrjg.1.000000000000208

References:

  1. McCallum IJ, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008; 336: 868-871. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39517.808160.BE
  2. Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, et al. Patientcharacteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinusdisease. Int J Colorect Dis 1995; 10:39-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00337585
  3. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, Duzgun SA, Coskun A: Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 1999; 165(4): 339– 42. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006875
  4. Vasanth V, Chandrashekar BS. Follicular occlusion tetrad. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2014;5: 491–3. doi: 10.4103/2229-5178.142517
  5. Yuksel M.E. Pilonidal sinus disease can be treated with crystallized phenol using a simple three-step technique. Acta Dermatovenerol APA: 2017;26:15-1. doi: 10.15570/actaapa.2017.4
  6. Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. Int Surg 2015:100(5):870–877. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1
  7. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 3-8. doi: 10.1007/s101510300001
  8. Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg. 2005;190:388-392. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.068
  9. Tavassoli A, Noorshafiee S, Nazarzadeh R. Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 343-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.009
  10. Petersen S, Koch R, Stelzner S, Wendlandt TP, Ludwig K. Primary closure techniques in chronic pilonidal sinus: a survey of the results of different surgical approaches. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1458-1467. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6451-2
  11. Isik A, Ery?lmaz R, Okan I, et al. The use of fibrin glue without surgery in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1047-1051.
  12. Dag A, Colak T, Turkmenoglu O, Sozutek A, Gundogdu R. Phenol procedure for pilonidal sinus disease and risk factors for treatment failure. Surgery 2012; 151: 113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.015
  13. M. Dessily, M. Dziubeck, E. Chahidi, V. Simonelli. The SiLaC procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: long?term outcomes of a single institution prospective study. Techniques in Coloproctology. Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Dec;23(12):1133-1140. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02119-2.
  14. Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol 2015;19:607–613. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3
  15. Sahasrabudhe P, Panse N, Waghmare C, Waykole P. V-y advancement flap technique in resurfacing postexcisional defect in cases with pilonidal sinus disease-study of 25 cases. Indian J Surg 2012; 74: 364-370. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0403-6
  16. Hosam R, Yasser A, Waleed A, Ibrahim A, Mokhtar F, Mohammed F. Rhomboid flap versus primary closure after excision of sacrococc?geal pilonidal sinus (a prospective randomized study). EJS 2010; 29: 4.
  17. Ölmez A, Kayaalp C, Ayd?n C. Treatment of pilonidal disease by combination of pit excision and phenol application. Tech Coloproctol 2013; 17: 201-206. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0903-9
  18. Meinero P, Stazi A, Carbone A, Fasolini F, Regusci L, La Torre M. Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment: a prospective multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis 2015; 18:164–170. doi: 10.1111/codi.13322
  19. Dalba?? E, Akgül O.L. Comparison of Limberg Flap and PiLaT Procedure in Primary Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Our Single Central Results. Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology. 2020;42: 148-154.
  20. Pappas AF, Christodoulou DK. A new minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with the use of a diode laser: a prospective large series of patients. Colorectal Dis.2018;20(8):207–214. doi: 10.1111/codi.14285
  21. Georgios K. Georgiou. Outpatient laser treatment of primary pilonidal disease : the PiLaT Technique. Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Oct;22(10):773-778. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1863-5
  22. Pronk AA, Eppink L, Smakman N, Furnee EJB. The effect of hair removal after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 2018:22:7–14. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1722-9
  23. Fj Conroy, Kandamany N, Mahaffey PJ Laser depilation and hygiene: preventing recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61:1069–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.022
  24. Girgin M, Kanat BH, Ayten R, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal disease: crystallized phenol and laser depilation. Int Surg. 2012;97:288e292. doi: 10.9738/CC130.1
  25. Yüksel E, Üstüner M.A. Comparison of Sinusectomy and Crystallized Phenol Procedure in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Acta Oncologica Turcica 2020;53-3;485-491. doi: 10.5505/aot.2020.33602
  26. Gecim IE, Goktug UU, Celasin H, Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment combined with crystalized phenol application may prevent recurrence, Dis Colon Rectum, 2017, 60(4), 405–407. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000778
  27. Akan K, Tihan D, Duman U, Özgün Y, Erol F, Polat M. Comparison of surgical Limberg flap technique and crystallized phenol application in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective study. Ulusal Cer Derg 2013; 29: 162-166. Doi: 10.5152/UCD.2013.2457
  28. Bayhan Z, Zeren S, Ayd?n S.A, Ucar B.I, Yumun H.N.A, Mestan M. Crystallized phenol application and modified Limberg flap procedure in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: A comparative retrospective study. Asian Journal of Surgery (2016) 39, 172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2015.12.007
  29. Chaudhuri A, Bekdash BA, Taylor AL. Single-dose metronidazole vs 5-day multi-drug antibiotic regimen in excision of pilonidal sinuses with primary closure: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:688–692. doi: 10.1007/s00384-005-0064-7
  30. Lundhus E, Gjøde P, Gottrup F, Holm CN, Terpling S. Bactericidal antimicrobial cover in primary suture of perianal or pilonidal abscess: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Acta Chir Scand. 1989;155:351–354.